Skip to content

Title options: Principal-100-quadrillion-agents problem / The Price of Not Being Cancer / Cell lines are immortal. Why aren't bodies? / The Price of De-Darwinization / Aging as a Coordination Arms Race / Pros and Cons of being Cancer / Ghost of our unicellular past / How Aging Solves Darwinism / Clonal Cooperators want to be Degenerate / So You Want to Invest in Longevity / To understand aging, think like a dictator / Defensive Degeneration

Argumentative Flow: The Price of Not Being Cancer

1. The Immortality Paradox Sets Up Our Mystery

  1. Hook: A record that shouldn't be broken

  2. Jeanne Calment lived 122 years - impressive!

  3. But wait... HeLa cells are about to break that record

  4. They're from 1951 and still dividing vigorously

  5. This is weird. Why should cancer cells outlive their host by orders of magnitude?

  6. The pattern emerges and deepens the mystery

  7. DFTD: 40+ years vs 7-year devil lifespan

  8. CTVT: 11,000 years(!) of continuous cellular life

  9. So this isn't just a lab artifact - it happens in nature

  10. The machinery for immortality clearly exists in cells

  11. The insulting simplicity

  12. Lab immortalization just needs a few tweaks (p53, Rb, telomerase)

  13. Wait, what? It's THAT easy?

  14. If cellular immortality is so accessible...

  15. → The Question: Why aren't our bodies using it?

2. Reframing Cancer Changes Everything

  1. What IS cancer actually doing?

  2. Prioritizing own replication

  3. Monopolizing resources

  4. Evolving independently

  5. Hold on... this sounds familiar

  6. The recognition: This is just normal life!

  7. For billions of years, this WAS the only game

  8. Unicellular competition, Darwinian selection

  9. Cancer cells aren't doing anything weird - they're doing the DEFAULT

  10. → The Reframe: Cancer isn't breaking the rules - it's following the ancient ones

  11. The implication hits hard

  12. If cancer = default state...

  13. Then multicellularity = active suppression

  14. We're not studying why cells "go bad"

  15. → New Question: How did evolution suppress evolution?

3. The Scale of the Problem Emerges

  1. Just count the agents

  2. 10^13-14 cells in humans

  3. 10^17 in blue whales (!)

  4. Each division = mutation opportunity

  5. Do the math: This should be impossible

  6. The principal-agent nightmare

  7. Germline = principal (wants long-term reproduction)

  8. Soma = trillions of agents (each potentially self-interested)

  9. Mutations = value drift

  10. This is the largest principal-agent problem imaginable

  11. The conceptual breakthrough

  12. Need "anti-evolution" mechanisms

  13. Must transfer fitness upward to organism level

  14. Call it "De-Darwinization"

  15. → The Challenge: What would such mechanisms even look like?

4. Layer 0: An ounce of prevention

  1. The "replicative credit" insight

  2. Think of genome stability as a budget

  3. High-fidelity replication = more safe divisions

  4. Can "spend" credits on size/regeneration/longevity

  5. But here's the thing: You can't have all three

  6. The investment

  7. Proofreading polymerases

  8. Multiple repair pathways

  9. Reduces mutation rate from μ_raw to μ_repaired

  10. Still imperfect though → Need more layers

**5. Layer 1: Establishing a death pact

  1. Making a death pact
    • Paradox: why would sea-dwelling creatures die? After all, its cells could just detach and survive as unicells. (SCANDAL hypothesis)
    • Define the distinction between transient colonial formations and obligate multicellularity
    • Transient colonies are "fleets" of agents, but each one is still self-sufficient when the fleet collapses
    • Obligate multicellularity restricts agents from surviving outside the fleet.
    • What's the fitness benefit?
    • What's the molecular mechanism of restriction?

  2. The germline innovation

  3. Separate "master copy" from "working copies"

  4. Makes soma disposable

  5. Clever! Somatic mutations can't propagate

  6. But wait: How do you enforce this separation?

  7. The enforcement mechanisms

  8. Weismann barrier (no going back)

  9. Unicellular bottleneck (fresh start each generation)

  10. Asymmetric division (born unequal)

  11. Creates the principal → But agents still need control

example: placozoans (trichoplax) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34788294/

6. Layer 2: Replication licensing

  1. Problems with static soma body plans
    • what if some cells are torn off? This just kills the body
    • Would be so easy to patch up the gap if only the neighboring soma cell could divide
    • But they cant - too much anti-defector red tape
    • the germ cell can divide, but its clones can't easily reach everywhere
    • need some way for the soma cells to divide to patch the gaps
    • this is regeneration - relaxation of anti-defector rules
  2. Too much regeneration is bad, too little regeneration is bad
    • 0 regeneration - die from every scratch, low lifespan
    • 100 regeneration - die from every pro-defector mutation, low lifespan
    • the maximum lifespan is somewhere between the too
    • draw the inverted parabola graph to illustrate
    • solution: local "aristocracy" of stem cells that keep some replication abilities after the body plan has fully formed

  3. The Pareto front reveals itself

  4. Size vs longevity vs regeneration

  5. Can't maximize all three

  6. Examples prove the point:

    • Whales: huge + long-lived = terrible regeneration

    • Mice: small + short-lived = great regeneration

    • Humans: stuck in the middle

  7. The control mechanisms

  8. Growth factor dependence (need permission)

  9. Contact inhibition (respect boundaries)

  10. Telomere shortening (built-in expiration)

  11. Each control = lost capability

  12. The evidence we're near the edge

  13. Martincorena studies: mutant clones everywhere!

  14. 50% of esophagus colonized by middle age

  15. Hundreds of mutants per cm² of skin

  16. → We're constantly on the brink

7. Layer 3: When Prevention Fails (Active Warfare)

  1. Its also possible to fight a tumor that has already appeared.

  2. The policing state emerges

  3. p53 network (self-destruct on losing purity, akin to seppuku)

  4. Immune surveillance (roaming enforcers)

  5. Physical barriers (walls and checkpoints)

  6. inflammation

  7. Getting desperate now

  8. The cancer incidence curve tells the story

  9. Exponential rise with age

  10. Defenses slowly losing the arms race

  11. → The Final Question: What happens when you're already implementing layers 0-3, but evolutionary pressure still rewards longer lifespans than what you currently have?

8. Layer 4: The Nuclear Option (Aging as Anti-Cancer)

  1. The police state analogy crystallizes
    • young adult - few mutated cells, defectors are a small and rare concern
  2. older adult - lots of mutated cells, defecfors are a huge and constant concern
  3. more defectors = more red tape needed to contain them
  4. over time, an individual organism's cells transition from high trust society to low trust society

  5. Society under threat → paranoid responses

  6. Trade freedom for security

  7. Everyone becomes suspect

  8. Sound familiar?

  9. Senescence: The perfect example

  10. Not just arrest - ACTIVE inflammatory state

  11. SASP = constant alarm bells

  12. 0% → 10-35% of cells with age

  13. The price: Chronic inflammation

  14. The pattern repeats everywhere

  15. Stem cell exhaustion (don't trust them)

  16. Fibrosis (wall everything off)

  17. Inflammaging (permanent high alert)

  18. Each "solution" becomes the problem

  19. The terrible realization

  20. These aren't failures - they're FEATURES

  21. Aging = maximum anti-cancer mode

  22. We're literally shutting down to avoid cancer

  23. → The Paradox: The cure is killing us

9. Why Simple Solutions Won't Work

  1. The naive approaches all increase cancer risk

  2. Clear senescent cells? Remove the guards

  3. Boost regeneration? Enable rebellion

  4. Extend telomeres? Unlimited cheating

  5. Every "anti-aging" therapy = pro-cancer

  6. The correct order emerges

  7. FIRST: Enhance genomic stability

  8. THEN: Better detection/elimination

  9. ONLY THEN: Reduce paranoid mechanisms

  10. Skip steps = disaster

10. The Fundamental Bind

  1. The inescapable tension

  2. Need cellular activity for life

  3. Activity enables mutation/evolution

  4. Suppressing evolution reduces function

  5. Can't win either way

  6. The multicellular bargain revealed

  7. Temporary suppression of internal evolution

  8. Cancer = breakdown of control

  9. Aging = reinforcing the dam

  10. Until it inevitably breaks

  11. The final insight

  12. We don't age because cells fail

  13. We age because we suppress cellular success

  14. The price of not being cancer...

  15. ...IS aging itself

**11. Why did I write this post?

**

  1. For understanding biology

  2. Explains Peto's paradox

  3. Unifies hallmarks of aging

  4. Reframes regeneration as "domesticated cancer"

  5. [Missing: Connection to negligible senescence species]

  6. For longevity research

  7. Most startups attacking symptoms not causes

  8. "Cellular immortality", "anti aging genes" claims = red flags for you to pick up on

  9. Need to respect Chesterton's fence

  10. [Missing: Positive examples of what might work]

  11. For philosophy of life

  12. Multicellularity as precarious achievement

  13. Internal evolution never stops

  14. We exist in constant tension

  15. The choice: vitality or security, never both